Cost tools show spend. Security tools show findings. GRC tools show compliance. None of them govern the decisions in between. Cloudeva.ai doesn't replace your tools — it fills the gap they can't.
| Capability | Cloudeva.ai |
Cost Tools (CloudHealth, Spot, etc.) |
CSPM / Security (Prisma, Wiz, etc.) |
GRC Platforms (Vanta, Drata, etc.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Intelligence | ||||
| Cross-domain signal correlation | ✓ Native | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic change attribution (AI agent · IaC · auto-remediation) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | |
| Cost + Security + Change in one view | ✓ Unified | Cost only | Security only | ✗ |
| Decision-ready context (not raw alerts) | ✓ EVA powered | ✗ Raw data | Partial | ✗ |
| Decision Intelligence | ||||
| AI advisor with plan-gated reasoning | ✓ EVA Advisor | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Auto-populated Decision Queue from ungoverned changes | ✓ EVA Loop | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Decision records with ownership | ✓ Native | ✗ | ✗ | Manual |
| Reconciliation (outcome misses → re-proposals) | ✓ Self-healing | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Outcome variance tracking | ✓ Built-in | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Governance & Compliance | ||||
| Policy-bound execution | ✓ Governance+ | ✗ | Detection only | Compliance only |
| Human-approved workflows | ✓ Enterprise+ | ✗ | ✗ | Manual |
| Immutable audit trail | ✓ All plans | ✗ | Partial | ✓ |
| Exception management with approvals | ✓ Governance+ | ✗ | ✗ | Manual |
| AWS + Azure unified | ✓ Native | Varies | Varies | ✓ |
| MSP multi-tenant | ✓ MSP plan | Limited | ✗ | ✗ |
| Progressive plan maturity | ✓ EVA-A model | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Command Center & Scoring | ||||
| AI-powered health scoring | ✓ EVA Score | Cost score | Risk score | Compliance score |
| Governance maturity scoring | ✓ Built-in | ✗ | ✗ | Manual |
| Data Privacy & Integration | ||||
| Data residency / sovereignty controls | ✓ Enterprise+ | Varies | Varies | ✓ |
| REST API + webhooks + SIEM | ✓ Full stack | API only | ✓ | Limited |
| ITSM integration (ServiceNow, Jira) | ✓ Business+ | ✗ | Jira only | Manual |
Monitoring tools tell you what changed in your cloud. Cloudeva.ai governs whether it should have changed. Each change is explained, verified against policy, and routed to an owner as a reviewable decision — so signals turn into accountable actions instead of dashboard noise.
No. Cloudeva.ai sits above them as a decision layer. Cost, security, and compliance tools keep generating their signals; Cloudeva.ai connects those signals to owners, decisions, and records, so the tools you already run become more actionable, not redundant.
AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform are all supported as first-class providers. Cloudeva.ai connects through a read-only role, so it can observe and govern every change without holding write access to your environment.
Every change is classified by actor — human engineer, IaC pipeline, or AI agent. Changes from AI agents and automation go through the same explain-verify-advise flow as human changes, so autonomous activity in your cloud stays visible, attributable, and governed.
See how CloudEVA helps your team turn cloud signals into clear, accountable decisions.